What Would Jesus Blog?

I would like to thank my brother for his honest, accurate, and sensitive post on me, a post that contained nary a trace of libel. He is good people.

No one posts to this blog anymore. It was different back in the day. Remember the '80s? Remember when we'd throw all-night coke parties at Marlowe's, hook up a bunch of computers, and blog until the sun came up, we puked blood on our keyboards, and passed out naked on her front lawn? We used to rock, man. We used to blog because shit needed to be blogged.

What are we blogging for now? WHAT ARE WE BLOGGING FOR NOW?

I'll tell you what: nothing. We Are America's Future, formerly a bellwether of America's fate, has been reduced to a has-been, a hanger-on, a barnacle barely latched to the algae-ridden underside of this once-great nation. All's lost. Game over, man -- game over.

But the flame still burns bright. For there are bloggers out there who, unlike our sorry lot, have not forgotten what blogging is about. When they blog, they're not typing with their fingers -- they're typing with their hearts. Literally. (Not Literally.)

Who are these brave warriors of blogtastic virtue? Who are these blogariffic blogheads whose very blogginess gives new meaning to the word? I'll tell you who: highboy of Christ Matters and Kerwin of Expressions of Liberty.

I'd like to spend more time on Kerwin, but first a brief note on highboy. Christ Matters is truly a revelation; finally, a blog willing to take the bold step of criticizing liberals, and one that understands that all they want to do is destroy America. Never before has the blogosphere seen such an audacious, rapier wit take on the decline of America.

Not only is he brave, intellectual, and unafraid to hold liberals accountable for their chicanery (and, let's face it -- for their pure, unadulterated evilness); he's also something of a military expert, as is clearly evident in his arguments for why we should attack Iran:

Military analysts have already proposed great campaigns for Iran, that wouldn't even include ground troops. These same experts helped put together the brilliant campaign for Iraq that subjugated the entire country in 21 days.

I cannot express how refreshing it is to find someone willing to cut through the spin, the lies, and the draconian rules regarding comma splices. Whereas a liberal would only refer to the Iraq adventure as a "brilliant campaign" with a sarcastic chortle, followed by a sip of his soy latte and a same-sex encounter with a horse, highboy tells us what we should already know: of course we could succeed in Iran -- all we would have to do is bring in the same people who planned the Iraq invasion. And we "wouldn't even [need to] include ground troops"! Unlike the liberal socialist fag whackjobs inhabiting the CIA, the Pentagon, and much of the Administration, all of whom say that it would be impossible to end the Iran threat through an air campaign because we have such poor intelligence on that country's nuclear facilities, and because said facilities are buried deep underground, spread over a wide area, and hard to positively ID from afar, highboy deftly defuses such naysaying by citing unnamed "[m]ilitary analysts" who undoubtedly have access to inside information.

But to continue to extol the virtues of highboy would be to ignore the brilliance of Kerwin. Though highboy is a paragon of intelligence, faith, and military knowledge, Kerwin bests him in just about every area. Kerwin is the LeBron James to highboy's Carmelo Anthony; the Singal to his Bielak, if you will.

It's important to immediately get one thing straight: Kerwin, as he tells it, is not a conservative; rather, he's a "classical liberal which is considered a type of conservative in these modern days. [He is] pro-right to life, pro-right to liberty, pro-parental rights, pro-right to property and a number of other natural human rights."

Are you reading me clear, you pinko homo God-sodomizers? He's a liberal, just like you. The only difference is that he knows how to make clear, convincing, intelligent arguments. Take his post about Paris Hilton, who recently claimed in an interview that she's toning down the promiscuity a bit:

I mention this because the values Miss. Hilton is speaking of are values known to be good for our society. They are the last values I expected to hear from anyone associated with Hollywood. We know that divorce is bad for our society, if only for the short and long term effects it has on children. There are adverse effects even in individuals that do not have children. Sex before marriage and adultery can have disaster consequences for our society. I suspicion that much of the drug use and crime can be traced to weak or no family bonds.

He's right, of course: If more people paid attention to people like Paris Hilton and "the values... she is speaking of," then "I suspicion" that our country would not be a cesspool of child-corrupting soul-cannibals.

But Kerwin's most powerful posts are his more macroscopic ones, in which he seizes the reins of power from those who would most secretly -- and sinisterly -- cling to them. This post was an Expression of Liberty Instant Classic. Most mainstream journalists are too terrified to report on the obvious, transparent plot through which Unitarian Universalists are trying to control the world via the United Nations. Not Kerwin, though. The post is too intelligent for me to provide my readers only with quotes; I'm going to include the whole thing:

Monday, June 05, 2006

The Power Of Unitarian Universalism And Its Thread To The Constitution

One point of morality which where Christianity and Unitarian Universalism are opposed is homosexuality. The U.U. adopted support for homosexual rights in the early to mid 70’s just about the same time the American Psychological Association came out with the announcement that homosexuality was not an insanity. There is most likely a relationship between the two.

The U.U. is the established religion of the United Nations which makes it one of the strongest organized religions in the world. It may well compete with the Catholic Church in sheer power. The U.U. owns United Press International which gave it quite a bit of influence through the media. The UPI has suffered a collapse and is no longer consider a major news organization which may have hurt the UU or may be because they have other more subtle means to accomplish the same goal. The UN had a meeting in 1981 in which they declared war on Christianity and other religions that they decide are intolerant and discriminatory. The “civil rights” arm of the United Nations is just a way for the U.U. to force their morality on the world. Evidence shows that they are successful with our top judges, the later even finally admitting that they are using “international law” to settle cases. Note the law is not really international but what the U.N. and it religious arm support.

Thanks to the U.U. we have the Muslim brotherhood that like Christians object to attacks on their religious rights. The Muslim Brotherhood under the nomenclature of Al Qaeda has attacked Western (International Community) interests a number of times including the World Trade Towers on 9/11. Anyone notice the word “World” as compared to the missing word “American” in the name. The HQ for the United Nations is located in New York City which makes it a nice primary target for Al Qaeda.

One thing I am not sure of is why the U.U. and atheist seem to be so linked. It is possible that the fact that atheist and U.U. members are often humanist may be the explanation. It may also be an alliance of convenience that comes from the idea that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

I wonder what the stance of the U.U. on the evolution/intelligent design debate. I suspicion that they are evolutionist as that is what our federal courts support.

I do know the U.N. advocates Open Borders and does not legally recognize that illegal aliens exist. That makes sense since there goal is to become a strong central government. The U.U. is just one way of unifying the people by unifying their religions.

I also believe that the U.N. is an enemy of protectionism.

posted by Kerwin | 10:21 PM

I don't even need to comment on this. It was like stumbling upon a pulsing emerald of pure knowledge. The puzzle pieces were always there, waiting in a box for a capable assembler; Kerwin dumped them out and put them together with uncanny dexterity and alacrity. Incredible stuff -- of course the liberal media would ignore the fact that it was the World Trade Towers. The evidence of the radical internationalist humanism that so obviously gave rise to Al Qaeda's radical religious fundamentalism was right there in front of our faces!

My sense is that Kerwin has a long, bright future ahead of him as a journalist, and I hope for the sake of America that I am correct. Whether he's arguing that cohabitation should be illegal, exposing "The Deadly Roots Of The ACLU," or issuing a pithy, logical, and utterly convincing explanation of why evolution is false, Kerwin continues to do his gritty journalistic grunt work despite the ubiquitous threat posed by a new world order dominated by secular humanists, Unitarian Universalists, and gays.

Thank you, good sir, for reason and common sense in an age of insanity.